FPO
A Full-Bodied Agile: Lean, Scrum, and XP
Agile’s Head: Lean

A mind to know, two hands to act
In two previous blog entries, we saw how Lean Software Development, with roots back to Lean Manufacturing, can provide the values which derive the underlying business value. In some ways, it acts as the “head,” telling us the “why” behind that “whats” and “hows” of Agile.
Agile’s Two Hands: Scrum and XP
In addition to the “why,” we also need to know “what” and “how.” I view these as the hands of Agile: one to guide the management practices and one to guide the software engineering practices.
But with so many different Agile methods, how do we choose? Fortunately, the answer is quickly emerging. Scrum has wide market buy-in as an Agile management framework, though it lacks any prescribed engineering practices. Extreme Programming (XP) also has significant buy-in. While XP has a less developed management framework, its strength lies in its quality-driven engineering practices.
Head and Hands: Lean, Scrum, and XP
We previously explored Lean’s values. At a high level, you can see the framework emerge.
|
|
|
This model also allows us to frame Agile readiness and Agile maturity in this way. Is the organization ready to embrace Lean principles? How prepared are teams for Scrum’s management processes? Are the technical infrastructure and software engineering practices ready to become more “extreme” with Extreme Programming?
We’ve already looked at Lean values. In future entries, we’ll dive deeper into Scrum management practices and XP software engineering practices. From there, we’ve laid our foundation for evaluating readiness and measuring maturity.
